Sunday 14 October 2012

A Critique Of The White Nationalist "Mantra"

So the reactionary community has come up with some ridiculous notion of "White genocide" recently. Apparently the thousands of Arab immigrants going to Europe, and Mexican immigrants to the United States constitutes a "genocide" of some sort. They insist that white people will eventually cease to exist because of this supposed genocide against the White race. White Nationalists developed something called the "Mantra" which is a short rant that they like to post on facebook and other media outlets.

"ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!"
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."

 "The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."

This is not what any "Multi-Culturalist" or "Cultural Marxist" or whatever term you are going to impose upon those who do not think the world should be divided into race based states and restrict human movement from one location to another completely. I, like pretty much any anti-Nationalist am okay with whites moving to Asia, Africa or Latin America, this double standard doesn't actually exist. The reason why the majority of immigrants choose to move to "white" countries is not because they are white, it is because it is economically within the interests of immigrants to do so. This is the same reason why Guatemalans immigrate to Mexico by the thousands, often risking life and limb to get there.

The very notion that people only immigrate to white countries is absurd. As I mentioned earlier thousands of Guatemalans immigrate to Mexico, literally around 70% of the population of Qatar are foreigners working in the country. The reasons why so many from Africa and Asia move to work in Qatar is because there is an economic incentive to do so. It has nothing to do with race, and everything to do with economics.

Once again, people do not only immigrate to "All white countries and only white countries", they immigrate because of the economic incentive to move to places where they can more easily access wealth. (ie. United States, Western Europe, Qatar and Mexico.)

I find it very hard to address the comment about the Netherlands and Japan being just as crowded, because I feel as if there is no point, it is simply rhetoric. Both the Netherlands and Japan have consistently declining birthrates, the existence of the Dutch and the Japanese are just as "at stake", one country (Netherlands) has decided to allow immigrants in to make up for this, while Japan has not, it in no way effects the existence of ethnically Dutch or Japanese people to have Third world immigrants living in their respective nations.

Let us use an analogy of apples. Let's say that the ever declining ethnic Dutch and Japanese birth rates are the rotting red apples, one pile of rotting red apples to the West (Holland) and the other pile to the East (Japan). In order to make up for the over quantity of apples in the Western pile, they have added green apples (immigrants) while the rotting pile to the East has not. the ethnic Dutch (rotting red apples) not at all effected by the introduction of the green apples, they will continue to rot away with them, just as Japan (pile to the East) continues to rot away without them.

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."

No one is advocating inter-racial marriage or voluntary assimilation as anything but morally neutral other than yourselves. No one considers inter-racial marriage the solution to any problem, they just argue that it should be allowed.

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"
 "How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"
 "And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?"

Historically, there has been tons of white immigration into Africa and under ACTUAL coercive conditions. I am completely okay with whites moving to Africa. However, there is very little incentive for Whites to move to Africa, due to the economic conditions of Africa being far worse than those of Europe or North America. I am completely against discrimination or exclusions of whites from Africa.

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

The White Nationalist propaganda actually does resemble the propaganda spread by the National Socialist's in Europe during the 1930s, using immigrants as a scapegoat for social ills. Just as the Nazi's used the Jews as a scapegoat, and claimed that the comprador German "Race traitors" in line with the Jews as an excuse to rid them from Europe. Originally, the Nazis had no plan to exterminate the Jews initially, they instead proposed similar solutions to what many White Nationalists I have spoken with have proposed. The Nazis desired to exile the Jews to Madagascar, as well as starting programs to bring them to Palestine. It was not until the later years of the war that the final solution was proposed, however it all started with the rhetoric of the Jews victimizing the German people, desiring a genocide of the Germans, much like what White Nationalists do today, simply replace Jew with Muslim. The propaganda is often different, removing the Jewish steriotype of the parasite from the top with the Muslim parasite at the bottom, with compradors in the Labor parties of Europe and the Democratic party of the United States.

"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."

Uh oh, I see we have fallen victim to the "Not collecting stamps is a hobby", and "Atheism is a religion" fallacy again...


2 comments:

  1. ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

    Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

    The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

    Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

    What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

    How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

    But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    ReplyDelete
  2. WN Failure. Only white countries are being flooded these people need to take a plane ticket to see the world. The internet is not a healthy place to source reality amd education from.

    ReplyDelete